|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 48 post(s) |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
885
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 20:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mme Pinkerton wrote:Heimdallofasgard wrote:Hell did VV or Akita T even see this coming? VV was predicting another big peak in minerals in July but guess this throws a spanner in the works of that plan how so? sounds like goons removed some ISK from the economy and blew up large stacks of high-ends. I like how now CCP is looking into taking action against Goons for blowing up their own **** for which they willingly paid too much.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
885
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 20:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Lord Jita wrote:Cipher Jones wrote: CCP finally released subscription numbers in May and admitted they are down tens of thousands of subs. In your world of advanced corporate maths I'm sure its somehow great to have less income and devalued currency.
erm.... Quote:CCP has send me new EVE numbers, they look good, 361k subs, so they can celebrate their 9th anniversary knowing they are back on the rise. http://mmodata.blogspot.com/2012/05/mmodata-charts-v39-in-works.html He even used the words "back on the rise". The page that you linked me to has a chart that says they are still down subs even after the new information. Thanks. Come on Cipher, we've been over this.
People like you and me, we keep on payin'. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
885
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 20:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Mme Pinkerton wrote:Heimdallofasgard wrote:Hell did VV or Akita T even see this coming? VV was predicting another big peak in minerals in July but guess this throws a spanner in the works of that plan how so? sounds like goons removed some ISK from the economy and blew up large stacks of high-ends. I like how now CCP is looking into taking action against Goons for blowing up their own **** for which they willingly paid too much.  This is probably the most succinct explanation of this. It's basically just old school insurance fraud + forex + manipulation
Thanks. I also like how you managed to farm losses in PVP in the only game out there supposedly designed around not allowing such a mechanic to be profitable. 
I fully appreciate why Soundwave hoped it failed. Well played, sirs. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
885
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 20:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Darth Gustav Running for CSM8 on a PRO-FW TICKET.
Look I really don't care about FW at all, but as your FW CSM representative I pledge to remain entrenched in null-sec fighting everyone I can engage. When targets are lacking, I pledge to remain further separated from FW by suicide ganking the remaining miners in high-sec who refuse to acknowledge that mining is not an AFK activity by design and philosophy. Therefore, unlike your current FW rep, Hans Jagerblitzen, I will remain neutral to your needs, wants, successes and failings. This is because they will all be totally irrelevant to me.
Therefore, as an objective but interested third party, I can more effectively address the failings and successes of FW as a feature and as an arena of iteration as shared by you all to me.
It might be early, but hell, give it a think. Do you really want your FW represntative on the CSM fighting against you after he admittedly completely neglected the respective complaints of one entire faction for his own personal gain and profit?
For that matter, "Impeach Hans!" He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
886
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 20:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ezra Tair wrote:Well. If CCP does not remove the isk. I'm sure you can do some really good market manipulation and ruin the game as has been the goal for some time now, yes?
If CCP does remove the isk, I wonder how things will go.
That ISk is literally in the hands of everybody in Eve already.
True story. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
886
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 21:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
pmchem wrote:Postin' itt because I'm part of the jewbal and reading about this in jabber has been amusing. They did good work. Very good work. This thread is all I expected it to be. Hi CCP!
I've also been too busy playing D3 to actually login and take advantage of this myself (when you are uberrich and also have a Titan, isk is no longer a motivation to login to Eve Online) . Since you don't login anyway and are obviously not biased, can I get your endorsement for FW CSM8? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
886
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 21:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sheynan wrote:Congratulations for the money  Anyway to clarify something this was after all just affecting the financial upgrade of FW. No systems were won or lost easier due to this. (So stop gloating about that Goons) This post made me think of a very good question for Aryth & crew:
Did this skyrocket your standings as a by-product?
Thanks in advance for the tip, either way.
saltrock0000 wrote:Well plaid goons......... well played.
On a side note, CCP nurfed incursions the ISK fountain but handed goons trillibillions trolololol
If i ever make a computer game, goons arnt invited to play :) Why not? Apparently it's a good business model...free advertising and rich clients! He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
886
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 21:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Sheynan wrote:Congratulations for the money  Anyway to clarify something this was after all just affecting the financial upgrade of FW. No systems were won or lost easier due to this. (So stop gloating about that Goons) This post made me think of a very good question for Aryth & crew: Did this skyrocket your standings as a by-product? Thanks in advance for the tip, either way. No, it doesn't impact your standings at all. Maybe CCP has the rewards systems for PVP and Plexing backwards, then?
I wonder what the FW crowd think. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 22:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
corestwo wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Ituhata Saken wrote:Dearest Market-Interested Space Tycoons,
At downtime today we made an adjustment to the average price of some items in order to curb a situation whereby the average price of an item could be manipulated in order to create a disparity between the value of an item in Isk and its value in Loyalty Point payouts. There will be additional changes in how this system works in the future. We will be monitoring for attempted manipulation of the LP market and will reverse any proceeds deemed to have been obtained through manipulative means. We are watching you. DonGÇÖt be That Guy.
By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch. So it's ok for CCP to gift it's pet players billions in isk in the form of T2BPO but when goons take you to the cleaners using brains they did wrong? Ehm no I'm glad CCP now knows what it's like to be an EVE inventor getting ripped off while trying to do an honest days work. Good Job goons, keep it up. You fight for the common EVE player against CCP and the pets. Burn New Eden in the name of the helpless. Goons have stolen CCP's silver spoon that they use to feed their pets and CCP is pissed off, good work goons! Spawning a T2 BPO is pretty clear cut, you know.
I think it was eleven. 
EDIT: Just looked it up, looks like it was eight. Still. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 22:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kethe wrote:LOL smug post about how you made 300trillion. And then cry when ccp says that they will take it all away. You used a loop hole to make the isk. It clearly states in the EULA abusing such loopholes will result in your character being banned. Goon tears best tears \o/ You seem pretty sure of that. Show me where scams are illegal by the EULA.
Plus that money came from everybody in Eve. Giving it back seems unlikely at best. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.21 22:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:More forum comedy ... oh the Drama... you folks(goons) should start a soap opera ... funny how some goons will go to desperately be the talk of the town .. TL;DR: Bleat. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 16:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Hans Jangerblitzen wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:It might be early, but hell, give it a think. Do you really want your FW represntative on the CSM fighting against you after he admittedly completely neglected the respective complaints of one entire faction for his own personal gain and profit?
For that matter, "Impeach Hans!" LOL and where, pray tell, was this "confession" ? I know how easy it is to see how hard I've worked to screw my enemies - maybe it was the part where I repeatedly said dockblocking could kill small gang PvP.? Or the part where I said the LP scaling was too extreme. Maybe it was the part where I said publicly that CCP needed to reset the warzone to undo my faction's plexing efforts pre-inferno so everyone started out on level ground? Perhaps you're referring to the fact that I asked CCP about making dockblocking a system upgrade rather than a fixed penalty (giving the Amarr more places they could dock). And OH YES. The profit I've made. Are you referring to the roughly 80,000 LP I've made since Inferno, due to the fact I'm usually out defensive plexing in fleets (which pays nothing)? Or do you mean the half-dozen 5000 LP implants I bought last Saturday after missing the tier 5 spike cause I had no LP saved up? Yeah, man, I scored so big there CCP should investigate me for abuse of power!  I appreciate the morning entertainment, you conspiracy nuts are always so much fun.
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:I read their document a couple of nights ago You "read our document", eh? A few days ago, eh? I guess that means you didn't actually make 8.7b, then, since that document was literally released 1 hour ago. Lots of us made billions, regardless of whether we knew about the manipulation or not. Every Minmatar that had saved up their millions of LP cashed out gloriously, albeit not on the scale of the manipulators. 8.7 billion is completely feasible given the opportunity that opened up. BTW, thanks for releasing the info and removing the artificial prop-up. You wouldn't believe how I excited I am that the Amarr have less to complain about now, this severely cuts into the "Boo-hoo minnies are steamrolling us the system is so unfair". I'd much rather have the warzone control based on the fighting merit of the two militias.If Tier 5 is indeed much more difficult to obtain, even with all the systems held by the Minmatar militia, we'll know here pretty soon, and it will mean the system is much less conducive to "snowballing" as the "losing" factions have complained about. If we are able to hit Tier 5 again, than it nukes the 3p33n claim that we only could ever achieve Tier 5 with Goon support. Either way its a win-win. You just made my life a lot easier - maybe not that of my militia, of course, but for me personally who's job it is to monitor the state of the warzone and assess the functionality and balance of the mechanics. You've cut through the noise quite a bit by allowing the war to just play itself out, without the skewed manipulation effort.This also means the Amarr are more likely to invest in actually winning their own war, instead of simply throwing alts into the Minnie militia to sip at our juice-fountain, if the days of the Tier 5 spike have come to a close for a while. Nicely done.
I bolded your poorly-considered confessions for you.
It sort of looks like a whole faction was complaining and you admitted to making billions off their woes to me, Hans.
And it also looks like you're glad the Goons were manipulating the system, because now you seem to think you're justified in ignoring your oppositions' complaints.
[sarcasm]Higher standards could not be had![/sarcasm] He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 16:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:~RL analogy~ aside, most hackers just end up with legal fees and criminal records. When someone perceives theft or compromised security they don't typically reward the action. But again, stupid to discuss when we are talking about a virtual world. I don't think the penalties will be light or harsh, just reversive. This is a far far cry from a bannable action. But it also won't be the witty enriching win ppl who benefit wish it was. The only thing they want to ensure is that things like this are bug reported. There isn't any need to either overly punish the ppl that did it or permit them to keep what they gamed out of the system. Especially when it could negatively impact so many players that were using the mechanics as intended for years. CCP just rejuvinated this aspect of game play. These guys compromised their product. Spit in their lunch. You really think they'll say "no big deal that these guys can wreck the LP markets for months single handedly. they earned it" ?! Wishful thinking is the nicest way I can phrase that type of intelligence w/o getting another forum ban. In fact, we already know what they'll say! Just look up  Just how is CCP going to reverse this? To eliminate the ill-gotten ISK all the customers of the goons will also have to forfeit their ill-gotten gear. That's most of Eve, by now. CCP is really going to take away the Republic Fleet Warp Disruptors from everybody who bought one at a slightly lower-than-expected rate?
I think not. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 17:15:00 -
[14] - Quote
Betrinna Cantis wrote:The funniest thing to see here would to have ALL of GSF punished for the actions of the few... Happens in the Military all the time. Then mayby some of you would start policing yourelves... then again mayby not. Uh...this is a game.
Do you "police" yourself when you play "Uno"?
What if your first hand is all Draw Fours and Skips? Do you call misdeal out of fairness to your competition?
What if this happens a hundred thousand times in a row. Were you an exploiter then? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
891
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 17:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Oisin Sandovar wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Betrinna Cantis wrote:The funniest thing to see here would to have ALL of GSF punished for the actions of the few... Happens in the Military all the time. Then mayby some of you would start policing yourelves... then again mayby not. Uh...this is a game. Do you "police" yourself when you play "Uno"? What if your first hand is all Draw Fours and Skips? Do you call misdeal out of fairness to your competition? What if this happens a hundred thousand times in a row. Were you an exploiter then? Only if i stacked the deck. In this case, you were not the dealer. =) He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
892
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 17:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
CCP designed the virtual equivalent of a money tree and then called it abuse when somebody set about harvesting.
This reminds me of a story in a really, really old book.
HEY! ONE OF THE CHARACTERS IN THE STORY WAS EVE! He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
892
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 18:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP's always asking us to Beta Test their software in a commercial environment after it's deemed "ready for release."
We pay for a half-baked half-developed product at least half the time.
All Goons did here was some really, really good Beta Testing.
Nevermind the initial feedback that was ignored, right? A Viking's gonna do what a Viking's gonna do...
We couldn't change that then. We can't change that now. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
893
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 18:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:I bolded your poorly-considered confessions for you.
It sort of looks like a whole faction was complaining and you admitted to making billions off their woes to me, Hans.
And it also looks like you're glad the Goons were manipulating the system, because now you seem to think you're justified in ignoring your oppositions' complaints.
[sarcasm]Higher standards could not be had![/sarcasm] You're absolutely right, other Minmatar certainly cashed out quite nicely during this spike, I however missed the boat. Last Saturday was the first time I'd sat down to grind LP, and ironically missed the big window Also, the Amarr have outright said they are plexing using Minmatar alts, so my enemies cashed out during this spike as well. As for my opposition's complaints, they were never ignored. The two biggest warnings I gave CCP prior to Inferno release were to not go with full station lockout, and to not have extreme LP scaling. These are also the two biggest concerns that my enemy's had, and continue to have. At the recent summit, I once again asked for station docking to be moved to a system upgrade, not a permanent feature. With the Goon exploit coming to light, now the developers can see what I warned them about - that maybe this extreme LP scaling might have unforseen consequences. What I've ignored since inferno's release, is the idea that Faction Warfare is somehow "destroyed" and that the Amarr situation is "hopeless". Everyone who argued against dockblocking (including myself) said it would kill the activity level throughout the warzone. The opposite has occured. I have a responsibility to argue for changes based on the *consequences* observed on Tranquility, and not to stick to rhetoric that crumbles under current events suggesting otherwise. Many Amarr claimed station lockout would make seizing systems impossible, that also turned out not to be true. It is only the doomsday predictions that have been thoroughly debunked since Inferno's release that I have ignored, I continue to pass on legitimate feedback to CCP on a regular basis. I am relieved that the market manipulation has ended not because my enemies have *nothing* legitimate to complain about, I am relieved that there is now a much more accurate picture of the war being documented so that everyone, friend and foe alike, can see whether or not things are as "hopeless" as some Amarr claim. If the mechanics are balanced enough to allow for a comeback despite the lack of Goon warzone control backing, we're in good shape. If the war continues to stagnate and remains one-sided, than my warnings to CCP about imbalance will be vindicated and maybe they'll listen to me in the future on these issues instead of saying "EVE isn't fair" and releasing the system as they saw fit. First, I have to emphasize that this is not personal. You are a representative and therefore subject to scrutiny.
Second, I'd say this is pretty doomsday and went on for long enough that you should have reacted to the needs of your constituency. Instead, according to Goon accounts, Minmatar FW as a whole did a bunch of back-patting when Tier 5 was reached in nearly every system. You had to know that was impossible. Further, you were obligated to listen to your opposition, who were obviously saying that something was wrong - a snowball effect.
Finally, I wish you good luck in damage control, spinning this as favorably as possible, and in general doing a better job of separating your two roles in Eve Online. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
893
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 18:20:00 -
[19] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:Pisov viet wrote:Khergit Deserters wrote:Not an exploit? 23.You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website.
What do you think, CCP?
It wasnt a bug. OK, not a bug. If we define a bug as a technical glitch, rather than an exploitable feature of the rules/game design. I believe CCP has considered some non-'bug' things as exploits before, no? In any event, the intent and purpose of the TOS provision is apparent from its language. Exploit... to gain an unfair advantage over other players.And then, in a separate issue, You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum.In any event, it's a manipulation of the game system to achieve an unintended result, of a pretty massive scale. Looks, walks and smells like an exploit to me. One time CCP called an entire advertised feature a bug, then an exploit. They ninja-edited all the advertising proaganda regarding it and named it Ghost Training.
So yeah, CCP will do what they want.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
894
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 18:25:00 -
[20] - Quote
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Unfortunately the focus isn't on working as designed, it's working as intended. Intended being the same word the EULA uses. Were BOB banned for POS bowling? Were NCdot, Raidendot, ev0ke and PL banned for using a feature "not as intended" (i.e. tracking titans to blap subcaps) to get access to tech? Were hisec pubbies banned for abusing neutral logistics? Were anyone banned for abusing the wardec mechanics by dogpiling on each and every public war? I never said anything about banning anyone. But do continue with whatever you are saying. edit: can you get your A team guys out here? this B team stuff is just getting lazy Please explain the difference between a feature working as designed and a feature working as intended.
I feel that they are virtually synonymous in this context, regardless of their respective denotative distinctiveness.
I eagerly await an explanation of how a system can be designed specifically to achieve different results than intended.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
894
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 18:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Dramaticus wrote:Item's CCP calculated value rises due to market forces: Working as intended LP is offered for faction warfare kills: Working as intended LP is redeemed for items: Working as intended
ehlp goons go in, LP comes out. its easy obviously not an exploit I wouldn't be an exploit if you had done it either. This seems to be the point your tinfoil hat is hiding from you. Well no. When I blow up an enemy BC and get LP for market value for his items that isn't an exploit. However gaming the market to inflate values of items, then blowing up ships I filled full of the items I just inflated the values of to produce ungodly LP payouts.... that might be an exploit. This seems to be the point your goonwashed brain is hiding from you. You know how CCP says they don't protect people from scams in Eve?
Yeah, by not listening to warnings of tying the market value to ISK, CCP refused to protect themselves from being scammed.
Long live the kings of the scam! He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
895
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 18:42:00 -
[22] - Quote
I keep waiting for PA to explain how you can design a system specifically to work in a way other than intended. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
895
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 19:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Or are they to be ignored because they aren't cool and edgy trying to figure out ways to violate the EULA everyday? The EULA wasn't violated. Keep telling yourself that B team. Heh. More insults. Weak. So, since you claim the EULA was violated, can you point out where? Because all I've seen are legal game mechanics working as designed, and auxilliary tools which CCP have specifically allowed. The part where it states you can't use the legal game mechanics in a way to give you unintended gains over other players. That part. We'll see what CCP says over what exactly was intended, but based on what they've said already it's not looking good for your side of the argument. Until then, your side will continue to insist it's legitimacy pointing out how different it is from other exploits while at the same time insisting CCP won't take the stuff back because of how they handled other exploits that were like theirs. I mean completely different from theirs. Or something. These gains weren't over other players. They were from other players. With the help of bad game design. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
895
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 19:04:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:then loyalty points that can be turned into isk (from thin air.)
Jade Constantine wrote:I think you need to read better.
No you. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
895
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 19:13:00 -
[25] - Quote
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:Weaselior wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote: "If I keep pointing out the simple steps taken to perform teh exploit it will magically not be an exploit anymore."
I'm actually going to talk to you like an adult here, so lets hope it works. The difference between an exploit and an unintended and undesirable use of game mechanics is that an exploit allows you, through various methods, to break a rule of the game. I will use an example from another game: Alpha Centauri, a great game, had a bug where if you gave the keyboard command for an airdrop, it would only let you do one per turn (as intended). If you used the mouse command, you could do as many as you wanted. That's an exploit, despite you doing nothing really wrong (hell many people who only used the mouse were unaware this limit was supposed to be there). On the other hand, a perfectly intended use of game mechanics - self-destructing missiles with a fusion or greater reactor - is incredibly overpowered and lets you wipe out stacks of units in a way that wasn't really thought though well. No part of it breaks the rules - it does damage to all surrounding units, just as intended - but it's really overpowered and something you patch out or make a house rule against. The key reason this is not an exploit is no rules were broken. The system functioned exactly as it was supposed to. Manipulating the price of an item is and always has been allowed (and is commonly used for margin scamming, or convincing people to sell stuff at a reduced price or buy it at an inflated price). Blowing up your own stuff to collect the proceeds is and always has been allowed. The issue is that once you combine the two, you get a situation that breaks no rule, but is highly undesirable (the generation of LP at a very low isk cost). If the mechanism allowed you to generate LP for free, there would be an argument it's breaking a rule of the game. But it didn't: every LP point you got cost you a specific amount of isk. Since this is undesirable, the devs will naturally patch it out. But because it was perfectly legitimate when done, it's clearly not something that people should be punished for. When it comes to confiscating the products of the scheme, I think it's clear that shouldn't be done as well - it would be an unfair punishment - unless the amounts generated were so vast the health of the game demanded it. That's a factual question that we can disagree over, but from my understanding of the market this is not a gamebreaking amount. For the vast majority of the time when these five were dumping, implant prices weren't artificially low: they merely were at their historical average instead of the spiked post-inferno price. This is a lot of money for these involved - sadly, I am not one of them and must be content with my vast guidance system riches - but it's not an amount that will seriously affect markets or devalue LP. I'm going to also talk to you like an adult, I'm confident that will not work. Alpha Centari aside, the focus of your argument is the difference between an exploit and unintended undesirable use of game mechanics. I get that. What you don't seem to understand is the similarities. Both are a violation of the EULA, it details this very specifically. Both are considered cheating by definition. If the one wasn't, it wouldn't be considered unintended and it wouldn't be detailed in the EULA. No one debates the fact the mechanic was broken. They admittedly maximized gains on it to a game breaking level. If I refer to it as an exploit, it's a matter of semantics, not a crushing defeat to my argument. They want bragging rights for performing an unintended stunt with game mechanics but at the same time want to insist it doesn't break any rules even though the EULA (the rules) says you can't do just that. Cognitive dissonance at its best. Posting to confirm Eve is broken. Nobody can buy Fleet Issue Stabbers. 
Nobody can log in. 
Please explain how a system can be designed to achieve results other than those intended. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
895
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 19:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
Actually, by ignoring the warnings and putting this in anyway, CCP tacitly agreed that this is a stellar idea and dared it to be done.
They did not release a statement with Inferno saying, "You better not blow up your own boats after manipulating the market!!!"
Even though they were warned of this.
Looks like tacit agreement to me. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
895
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 23:35:00 -
[27] - Quote
SeaBassSA wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Aryth wrote:I understand what you are saying. But like you said, it was Goons vs Sandbox. This was never about Goons vs CCP. . And now it has turned into CCP vs Sandbox. Or Sony vs CCP/Sandbox/Goons Sony doesn't make 4x4's, come on... He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 06:41:00 -
[28] - Quote
Maestro Antollare wrote:Cerebral Wolf wrote:Whats with the stupid bank analogy you all need to share? Can't you use your own special snowflake one or can you not think of your own?...
ok, sure let's say you read the patch notes for your favorite game and notice an interesting loophole in the patch notes you test and confirm your discovery in game, and use it to accumulate a significant amount of wealth the devs discover the loophole, and patch it you find the patch didn't fully correct the loophole, and adjust your plan to compensate after you're tired of using the loophole, you make a bombastic post on the forums telling the devs and other players what idiots they are for not seeing it sooner tears flow in copious amounts At the end of the day I feel the worst for the FW people. They wanted content iteration and got this.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 06:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Nevigrofnu Mrots wrote:
1st moment - They fill ships with their stuff, blow them up, gain LP.
That by itself pretty much screams exploit to me lol but eh, then I guess I have that common sense trait Their ships were being blown up by characters of the opposing faction. How does that scream exploit to you? thats not what it says "1st moment - They fill ships with their stuff, blow them up, gain LP." THEY fill ships with THEIR stuff ten blow them up. This looks to me like its saying they fill ships with their own stuff and then purposely destroy them (IE self destruct). And get LP for it. Not they get them destroyed by the enemy. I thought Malkavians were liberated by such construct as respect of person and possession. Hell, don't you think you are the enemy half the time when you're a Malk?!?
 He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 06:49:00 -
[30] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:David Carel wrote:Eref Ataru wrote:A flaw is a flaw. Intentional or not. The exploitation of a flaw is against the terms of use. Which according to the sign up is a ban not an asset freeze, not a slap on the wrists it clearly states ban.
When there was that exploit on the new forum which allowed people to see areas they couldn't CCP said then, thanks for pointing it out but leave it now, sees theres showing that a flaw is there then there's using a flaw to your advantage realising that it's gone too far, informing CCP of the flaw, and hoping it all goes away.
If goons had been sensible enough to keep it private between CCP and select others then, they probably would of kept the lot, now I think they have forced their hand, and as a player of this game I expect the full punishment of banned accounts, else the only message that gets sent out is that if you get caught they take it back, the message should be you exploit you get banned. Same as bots. TOS wrote: You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website.
The only problem is, it's not a bug. The individual parts are working exactly as intended. You can build a skyscraper with perfect sub-components, perfect materials, in the best place and... bork the structural calculations so it crumbles after 2 weeks. Individual parts worked exactly as intended but now it's a pile of dirt. Your comparison is flawed. The "Jewbal" built the economic equivalent of a warp drive with the economic equivalent of tinker toys.
That's why everybody's so mad.
Economic warp fields shouldn't be possible with Viking-made formulae. Icelandic Calculus is champion. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 06:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:I thought Malkavians were liberated by such construct as respect of person and possession. Hell, don't you think you are the enemy half the time when you're a Malk?!?  Depends On the individual. Im saving the universe from the evil that are oranges. I have a whole speech prepared on how they take over your mind with the juicy (supposed) goodness that you eat/drink and it shifts your conscousness towards pro orange agendas. The only REAL problem I have is the lack of an ability to sleep and the random voices saying stuff that distracts me from what Im attempting to do at the time. Its extremely annoying given that I KNOW they dont actually exist yet even KNOWING THAT I cant just writ them off cause they tell me important things. Yeah plus they grow in sunshine and wither in your presence, so...
I totally take your point. Oh did you hear Abraham Lincoln was a vampire hunter?!? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 07:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
15th Century Portrait wrote:after this many pages, is there anything left to say?
except. p.e.n.i.s. How many peeps did it take to make that wig?!? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 07:31:00 -
[33] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:technically you Goons said it first some 20 or so pages ago Look let's look at this from the other angle OK?
99.44%* of Goon transactions purveying anything faction are scams.
Yet in this "exploit" the customers got real merchandise every single time.
And they gladly gave their money for the items, because they were quite affordable.
A large amount of ISK was also destroyed.
What's the problem here, again? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 07:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:technically you Goons said it first some 20 or so pages ago Look let's look at this from the other angle OK? 99.44%* of Goon transactions purveying anything faction are scams. Yet in this "exploit" the customers got real merchandise every single time. And they gladly gave their money for the items, because they were quite affordable.A large amount of ISK was also destroyed. What's the problem here, again? [edit: * That might be the percentage of pure soap in Ivory, I'm not sure.] Never said there WAS a problem (well not in that quote anyways) I pointed out I thin the first people to talk about market manipulation being illegal now or bannable or something (its 3 am im tired) WERE the Goons in this thread lol As far as the whole issue goes I go with what CCP says. They made the game, they should know what they intended etc. Fair enough. I just thought that this frame of reference at least bore mentioning. After all, it's true.
These legions of people were actual happy Goonswarm customers. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 07:43:00 -
[35] - Quote
corestwo wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:technically you Goons said it first some 20 or so pages ago Look let's look at this from the other angle OK? 99.44%* of Goon transactions purveying anything faction are scams. Yet in this "exploit" the customers got real merchandise every single time. And they gladly gave their money for the items, because they were quite affordable.A large amount of ISK was also destroyed. What's the problem here, again? Ahem. While I appreciate your attempts to defend us with this analogy, I find it distasteful as I was formerly the largest contract dealer of 0.0 faction goods in Eve, and none of my contracts for faction goods were scams. How dare you impunge my honour, good sir! I apologize, but you must admit your fellow...ahem...Goon competitors had a lower cost of doing business, even if it meant their...um...volume...was um...slightly lower than yours.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 07:49:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Your comparison is flawed. The "Jewbal" built the economic equivalent of a warp drive with the economic equivalent of tinker toys.
That's why everybody's so mad.
Economic warp fields shouldn't be possible with Viking-made formulae. Icelandic Calculus is champion. No everybody are not so mad at all. This is my post in this very thread: "BRAVO GOONS!". But now that they proved their point and shown CCP they outplayed them, look at the thing for what it is (an abuse) and undo the damage done on the game. They got their "medal" and media e-fame, along with the privilege for not being banned that's all the prize they should keep. I want you to tell me who, exactly, was abused here. Who didn't have the same opportunity to leverage advertised mechanics?
To be abuse it has to be an unfair advantage. The mechanic was advertised.
Was it the people who got the cheaper faction modules? Were they abused?
Was it Beta Testers who commented to CCP about the vulnerability of the system as-developed?
What was abused here? I can't see anything that wasn't "working as intended" if we're being totally honest about it.
The system was designed to do what it did. When applied, the system worked as predicted by its design parameters.
This was no exploit. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 07:58:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:corestwo wrote: Depends on the devs. I've heard exactly what you described (well, close) happened in EQ 2 or something, and SOE flipped out and banned. On the other hand, I've heard something like it happened in LOTR Online and the devs there went "yep, our fault" and simply fixed it and moved on.
CCP are indeed saying "yep, our fault" and are simply fixing it and moving on. I still see you posting so they did not ban hammer you or anything, just undoing the game damage. corestwo wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: You can build a skyscraper with perfect sub-components, perfect materials, in the best place and... bork the structural calculations so it crumbles after 2 weeks. Individual parts worked exactly as intended but now it's a pile of dirt.
I know what you're trying to say, mostly because you've said it again and again, but...your example sucks, because if you "bork the structural calculations" then individual parts were not, in fact, working as intended.  Yes they were individually working as intended, it's just the architect who fat fingered his calculator and did not type a zero so that one of the perfect individual parts put in there were not sufficient to keep the building up. Vaerah, they worked correctly not just taken separately, but exactly within deisgn parameters when combined, as well.
I can't stress this enough: This only worked because the "Jewbal" developed a model based explicitly on CCP's design parameters precisely as stated in various press releases. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
Haikato Saraki wrote:Aryth wrote:CCP has now gone and nuked a ton of assets on our accounts. Meaning, we are losing wealth we had previous to this. Wow. But the message is clear. If you want to abuse something, you do not report it. As someone who tried to work with CCP, my advice to anyone in the future is. Don't. this has been stated and restated several times in this threadanaught but all it really boils down to is; "we weren't as evil as we could have been." ...which as far as legal defences go is only slightly better than "the b!tch had it coming." If it had been Jade instead of you who had found and abused this, would you seriously try to tell me you would be lobbying as hard for them to keep the assets gained from this exploit? Honestly, seems to me that the only reason the involved "jewbal" haven't been banned is BECAUSE they brought it to CCP's attention. I sincerely hope that you DO try to keep it hush-hush the next time you find something like this because when CCP uncovers that future exploit your gona lose a lot more than you did today. epic exploit was epic, but did you really expect to crash the LP markets with an exploit and get away with it? Please demonstrate how this was an exploit when CCP hasn't even completed their explanation. That's a mighty big strawman you built there. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
897
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:13:00 -
[39] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: I want you to tell me who, exactly, was abused here. Who didn't have the same opportunity to leverage advertised mechanics?
To be abuse it has to be an unfair advantage. The mechanic was advertised.
I copied the word that a CCP employee officially used in this thread. If you don't like he wrote abuse, then feel free to unsub. Darth Gustav wrote: The system was designed to do what it did. When applied, the system worked as predicted by its design parameters.
This was no exploit.
That's why said CCP employee said "abuse" and not "exploit". And this is the only reason why the involved players have not been banned. I suppose in CCP's house they have the right to have a "We're never wrong." policy.
We'll see how that goes for them on this.
As usual, I'll be watching what they do, not what they say. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
Elysium Foxx wrote:so i have this text book i'm using for a University degree - in it it has a definition of an exploit.
blah blah.... or, an exploit can be a documented process to take advantage of a vulnerability or exposure, usually in software, that is either inherent in the software or is created by the attacker. .... blah blah.
page 10 chapter 1 Principles of Information Security by, Michael E. Whitman & Herbert J. Mattord
Just thought i'd share that with the thread. Not sure if its relevant. This was not taking advantage of a vulnerability or exposure, though. It was just maths and nothing broke.
Bad design is not vulnerability. It's just bad design. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: I can't stress this enough: This only worked because the "Jewbal" developed a model based explicitly on CCP's design parameters precisely as stated in various press releases.
No, because the most basic design parameter for a moving average is to smooth fluctuations, while it has been subverted to amplify them. By poor design, not by exploitation. This did not require any exception cases to occur and anybody could have utilized it, though it's doubtful many had the resources and the mental faculty to pull this off. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:26:00 -
[42] - Quote
Elysium Foxx wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Elysium Foxx wrote:so i have this text book i'm using for a University degree - in it it has a definition of an exploit.
blah blah.... or, an exploit can be a documented process to take advantage of a vulnerability or exposure, usually in software, that is either inherent in the software or is created by the attacker. .... blah blah.
page 10 chapter 1 Principles of Information Security by, Michael E. Whitman & Herbert J. Mattord
Just thought i'd share that with the thread. Not sure if its relevant. This was not taking advantage of a vulnerability or exposure, though. It was just maths and nothing broke. Bad design is not vulnerability. It's just bad design. So you think using maths to create "free" LP would not break the system (EVE economy) if it was left as it was? In other words - you think if nothing had changed that this would not leave the system vulnerable. The system was flawed, had a vulnerability to abuse - it was abused, therefore, it was exploited. But keep buzzing, maybe if you say it enough times you will brainwash CCP into believing you. Those LP cost literally dozens of ISK per unit. That is far from free. 
When there is a cost incurred, how is a player to inherently know it's out of whack? 
What other store doesn't honor their price labels? 
How's this for buzz?  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: I can't stress this enough: This only worked because the "Jewbal" developed a model based explicitly on CCP's design parameters precisely as stated in various press releases.
No, because the most basic design parameter for a moving average is to smooth fluctuations, while it has been subverted to amplify them. By poor design, not by exploitation. This difference matters, because it's why the players did not get banned. But be it poor design or exploitation, the mechanic has been subverted and this is why they roll back the gains. You call this perfect and predicted functionality subversion.
I do not think it means what you think it means.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:37:00 -
[44] - Quote
Elysium Foxx wrote:Yeh, maybe we should count the amount of posts in this thread.
a percentage of Goon+ goon supporter posts to others posts.
See how deep that pool of tears actually is.
I have this textbook. It clearly shows that the multiplicative and divisive properties of equality are firmly intact.
Regardless of what the values are in the numerator or denominator, the properties continue to work. The obvious exception is the case of division by zero, which this was not.
It is not the "Jewbal's" fault these absolutes are not observed in Iceland.
Maybe I can send them my math book.
He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Elysium Foxx wrote:Dave stark wrote:Elysium Foxx wrote:Yeh, maybe we should count the amount of threads.
a percentage of Goon+ goon supporter posts to others posts.
See how deep that pool of tears actually is. it really has nothing to do with "supporting goons" at all. the entire point is whether they were within the limits of the sandbox or not. to me, they were. ccp added the formula to reward lp on a sliding scale based on the isk damage inflicted upon an enemy when their ship went pop. ok, manipulating the average price on an item was a bit close to the line, but isn't that what people sit in jita and do all day every day anyway? the only real difference between what goons did, and what your average player does on a daily basis is scale, and scale is the only thing that's caused an issue here. at least, as far as i can tell. I actually agree with you to a certain degree, and think what these guys did is impressive and could really only be done effectively with massive amounts of collateral, however, the fact is they exploited a known vulnerability in a system and should get punished. I personally think that removing any assets and ISK the made from this venture, leaving the offenders out of pocket the amount that they investeted is enough of a punishment. But they did exploit the system, and CCP's own rules state that anyone exploiting the system will be subject to potential bans. and it could (and has been, repeatedly) argued that if ccp didn't want this to happen it shouldn't have left sisi. goons say they warned ccp, ccp released it anyway. it means either ccp didn't know [and goons lie] and didn't test it enough, or ccp did know [ccp lies] and didn't care. but hey we're going around in circles beating a dead horse, again. all we can really do is wait for monday's ccp dev blog/post on here/smoke signal/telegram
Good point. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 08:57:00 -
[46] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Dave stark wrote: it means either ccp didn't know [and goons lie] and didn't test it enough, or ccp did know [ccp lies] and didn't care. but hey we're going around in circles beating a dead horse, again. all we can really do is wait for monday's ccp dev blog/post on here/smoke signal/telegram
Unlike others, I don't want to spread rumors. But for what I can recall from past posts, CCP did see the potential for a vulnerability but it was too late to take a decision like they did for this latest patch (i.e. delay it for 1 week to squash the last minute bugs) so they had to push it out anyway. The true mistake on CCP part in this case, would be to under-stimate how emergent players would immediately use the vulnerability at their advantage on huge scale. I won't spread rumors. I'll state facts.
Here's one:
CCP Soundwave hoped this "feature" would fail miserably.
Here's another one:
CCP Soundwave got what he hoped for. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 09:04:00 -
[47] - Quote
Ghost Xray wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Those LP cost literally dozens of ISK per unit. That is far from free.  When there is a cost incurred, how is a player to inherently know it's out of whack?  What other store doesn't honor their price labels?  How's this for buzz?  Guy, even the OP knew it was broke/out of whack/plain goofy and game breaking, which is why he was tweeting CCP in the first place, leading to all this terrible posting. He wrongly thought it'd be cool for him to break it just a "little bit" for his own gain. I guess that's why he's known, even amongst your own rank, as a sociopath. Take off your Goon goggles for a second and try and look at this objectively. What he knew is that CCP put it in aware that it worked the way it was designed to work and that CCP quite mistakenly thought it could/would stand on its own merit.
So he tried it out, it worked so well that he then told CCP how broke it was.
There's a difference. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
898
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 09:08:00 -
[48] - Quote
Pisov viet wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Richard Desturned wrote: so you're saying that market manipulation should be bannable
I would not, I actually applaud at their genius. But the game companies usually don't like this kind of genius played on their products, so - regardless of me or you liking it or not, they go very heavy handed. Point in case, in WAR in the last months there have been: - Mass people banning because they discovered they could get an health buff thru a pet by going in certain zones. Developers used a flawed formula... rings you something similar? - Mass people perma banning with no recourse allowed because they discovered they could increase their stats a lot by clicking on certain NPCs, which applied a formula that could be gamed. The comparison is wrong. In both the cases you quoted, the players were performing an action that had an unexpected and unwanted result, disconnected from the game's design. Here, the players did what they were supposed to do. They enroled in militia, they blew ships up, they gained LP for it. Then they figured how that LP was calculated, and made sure it would be as high as possible. Unless the function calculating ship cargo value on the exchange price SOMEHOW wrote itself during the development, SOMEONE in CCP thought "Well, let's just calculate the average price at which it was exchanged.", and, apparently, nobody cared about that part, or nobody thought "hey, there are a fuckton of people running margin trading scams by labelling useless items higher than what they're worth. This may mean that average market prices is not representative of the item value". A similar thing may have happened if someone in a FW was running such a scam, hauling a hundred of items he buys 1m and sell 1b, got blown up and the killer received LP based on 100*500m. He, too, would have received a huge amount of isk. And it wouldnt have been "exploiting a bug". This post is absolutely brilliant.
Thank you for the /thread. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|
|
|